Alec Teal
2014-03-13 01:54:38 UTC
Hello all,
This is my first post here and I regret that it is not solely to say
thanks, I love wxWidgets (because it provides a lovely interface,
everything is named intuitively so I rarely have to search or open the
book I purchased, it's cross platform and doesn't get in the way of the
build process (LOVE that last one) and many other things) and I wish
donations were open.
I am writing though with a small complaint, I rarely create custom
events, so I have to reference something when I do, obviously I went
right for the wiki:
http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Custom_Events
BUT it's been updated, to 3.0 stuff. I'd really like it if 3.0 things
could have their own pages, this is after all why Wiki's have
namespaces, a simple template at the top for "this is deprecated" and a
link to the new version would be all that you need. I've just checked,
it is MediaWiki so this is certainly true.
This is something I could help with but I have yet to touch 3.0 stuff,
or even 2.9 really, I only recently moved from 2.6 to 2.8 and I like to
keep wxPython at the same version. I doubt I am alone. I know legacy
support sucks and I am part of a problem I loath just by writing this
but wx2.8 (even 2.6) is far from dead, and I'd be very grateful if the
documentation for each was disjoint.
Alec
This is my first post here and I regret that it is not solely to say
thanks, I love wxWidgets (because it provides a lovely interface,
everything is named intuitively so I rarely have to search or open the
book I purchased, it's cross platform and doesn't get in the way of the
build process (LOVE that last one) and many other things) and I wish
donations were open.
I am writing though with a small complaint, I rarely create custom
events, so I have to reference something when I do, obviously I went
right for the wiki:
http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Custom_Events
BUT it's been updated, to 3.0 stuff. I'd really like it if 3.0 things
could have their own pages, this is after all why Wiki's have
namespaces, a simple template at the top for "this is deprecated" and a
link to the new version would be all that you need. I've just checked,
it is MediaWiki so this is certainly true.
This is something I could help with but I have yet to touch 3.0 stuff,
or even 2.9 really, I only recently moved from 2.6 to 2.8 and I like to
keep wxPython at the same version. I doubt I am alone. I know legacy
support sucks and I am part of a problem I loath just by writing this
but wx2.8 (even 2.6) is far from dead, and I'd be very grateful if the
documentation for each was disjoint.
Alec
--
Please read http://www.wxwidgets.org/support/mlhowto.htm before posting.
To unsubscribe, send email to wx-users+***@googlegroups.com
or visit http://groups.google.com/group/wx-users
Please read http://www.wxwidgets.org/support/mlhowto.htm before posting.
To unsubscribe, send email to wx-users+***@googlegroups.com
or visit http://groups.google.com/group/wx-users